Pakayla Biehn's paintings derived from double exposure photography. Check out her whimsical paintings from her site: http://www.youshouldtakecare.com/
Friday, May 11, 2012
Contemporary Photorealist: Natalia Fabia
Proud "Hooker" painter, Natalia Fabia presents her latest collection East Village Sparklers featured in gallery from April 17, 2012.
Past Artworks
Past Artworks
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Photography into Painting
Kim Jong-un, 39 pieces (each 8"x11"), mixed media, 2012.
Kim Jong-un, 54'x60', mixed media, 2012
by jihae ParkIn this semester, I tried to study screen print and digital print technique.
I believe my works are related with this class; Photography into Painting. People can easily notice about specific figure picture at my works even though it was destroyed and painted.
I used digital print, silk screen, transfer images with yupo paper, and then acrylic and oil paint on papers and canvases. I'd like to express about photography as a painting itself with my perspective. I transferred his photography found at online and then painted overlapped of photographs itself with my statement about work process.
When I went to the Art Institute of Chicago, I stuck by Andy Warhol's Mao. I'd wanted to reference from it and make mine with Kim Jong-un image because I have some personal experiences about North Korea that I never forget it.
When I was young, my grandmother talked to me about the war between North and South Korea.
Few years ago, I could travel Gaesung city which is second capital city of North Korea. That made me remind of Kim Jong-un. However, I do not focus on political issue for my work. I'd like to think about just as one man who is just four years older than me.
Kim jong-un is the current Supreme leader of North korea. He is born 8.January 1983. I kept considering to express and imagining about his non political and his unknown personal life. His life could be really different from our lives. I am wondering and interested in his unveiled life to my work.
Why we prefer a photorealist painting over a photo
Psychologist Paul Bloom does a really interesting TED Talk about how our brains value something more or less based on our perception of its origins. He begins with a story about a Nazi officer who learns that his prized Vermeer painting is actually a very precise forgery, and commits suicide soon after.
This explains why someone might pass over as image they perceive as a photograph without a second glance, and look at it for hours if they later learn its really a painting. Though I feel that we've sort of resolved this issue in class already, Blooms does a very thorough job of explaining why our experience with an object is altered according to our perception of it's history. A Richter painting, for example, would be received very differently if it were a photograph. I'm totally guilty of this. I kept walking through the Richter room in AIC without a second glance at that painting of the yellow flowers, thinking absentmindedly that it was a photograph. Only upon learning that it was a painted image did I begin to grow a fondness for it. When we experience a painting, we imagine that it takes time and effort. We are dissatisfied with simply the image, and need illusions of labor and process in order to respect or appreciate it.
The video's kinda long, but Bloom is a really engaging speaker and I bet if you start watching that you won't stop until the end.
This explains why someone might pass over as image they perceive as a photograph without a second glance, and look at it for hours if they later learn its really a painting. Though I feel that we've sort of resolved this issue in class already, Blooms does a very thorough job of explaining why our experience with an object is altered according to our perception of it's history. A Richter painting, for example, would be received very differently if it were a photograph. I'm totally guilty of this. I kept walking through the Richter room in AIC without a second glance at that painting of the yellow flowers, thinking absentmindedly that it was a photograph. Only upon learning that it was a painted image did I begin to grow a fondness for it. When we experience a painting, we imagine that it takes time and effort. We are dissatisfied with simply the image, and need illusions of labor and process in order to respect or appreciate it.
The video's kinda long, but Bloom is a really engaging speaker and I bet if you start watching that you won't stop until the end.
Andy Warhol (Marilyn Monroe)
Andy
Warhol
who is
one of the most influential and well-known
artists around the world. Having made multi productions on a same object,
especially famous for paining Marilyn Monroe, he is a leading figure in
pop art. Warhol
started to paint famous objects or people: Marilyn
Monroe, Elvis Presley, Elizabeth Taylor, Dollar Signs, and Coca Cola
Bottles,
with the series of other paintings called “death and disaster.” However,
Warhol
painted Campbell’s Soup cans
not because they were
very special, but rather he painted them because he wanted
to paint nothing. In most of Warhol’s work, he often based on the
photographs,
and he made mass-produced objects, drawing on his extensive advertising
background. Most importantly, Warhol liked using Fauve colors, the
non-representational colors of Pop Art, or better known as artificial or
flash
colors. However, he did not know which colors were the right colors when
he was in a progress of painting.
Warhol was very fascinated with morbid concepts, but his art works
came out with very beautiful and
brilliant colors, especially in the images of Marilyn Monroe.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Robert Doisneau
Robert Doisneau was a French photographer. In the 1930s he used a Leica on the streets of Paris. He and Henri Cartier-Bresson were pioneers of photojournalism. He is renowned for his 1950 image Le baiser de l'hôtel de ville (Kiss by the Town Hall), a photograph of a couple kissing in the busy streets of Paris. Robert Doisneau was appointed a Chevalier (Knight) of the Legion of Honour in 1984.
He worked at Renault before photographer career, but he soon got fired because of constant lateness. He first started his career as a postcard photographer, and he got fame because of his Le Baiser de L’hotel de Ville. He mostly took snapshots of paris living people. He was very skillful to take a picture of a moment. I really like his fun pictures.
Joel Meyerowitz
http://vimeo.com/38937942
An award-winning street photographer who has been creating memorable images in the great photojournalistic tradition since 1962, Joel Meyerowitz pioneered the use of color in this slice of life genre, and his classic book on Cape Cod, “Cape Light” was instrumental in changing the prevailing dismissive attitudes toward color photography. Within a few days of the 9/11 attacks on The World Trade Center, Meyerowitz began to create an archive of the destruction and recovery at Ground Zero that consists of over 8,000 images of the aftermath of the tragedy. In this latest Leica Portrait video, Joel shares the story of his transition from junior art director to legendary photographer.
An award-winning street photographer who has been creating memorable images in the great photojournalistic tradition since 1962, Joel Meyerowitz pioneered the use of color in this slice of life genre, and his classic book on Cape Cod, “Cape Light” was instrumental in changing the prevailing dismissive attitudes toward color photography. Within a few days of the 9/11 attacks on The World Trade Center, Meyerowitz began to create an archive of the destruction and recovery at Ground Zero that consists of over 8,000 images of the aftermath of the tragedy. In this latest Leica Portrait video, Joel shares the story of his transition from junior art director to legendary photographer.
Blind Man, Spain, 1967
The Twin Towers, 2001
Cypresses, Early Morning, Tuscany, 2002
Before being a photographer, he studied painting and medical illustration, and then worked as an art director some time. These experiences of wide range are core of his style of photography. In other words, he does not limit photography of means. His photography range is very broad: space, architect, portrait, and nature. He is one of pioneering color photography.
David Hockney by Kristy Chae
Though
photography and paintings are similar in a way both of them can capture moments
in time that are accurate, David Hockey, one of the famous leaders of the pop
art movement, says, “Photography will never equal painting!” David Hockney is a
painter, draughtsman, printmaker, stage designer and photographer, and also, he
is considered one of the most influential British artists of the twentieth
century. In addition, Hockney is well known for taking detailed individual
photographs and putting or compiling them together like a puzzle. During
1980’s, Hockney made lots of photo collages and photomontages.
Merced
river, 1982
My
mother
Noya
and Bill Brandt
Pearl
blossom highway
The Cubism and photography exists together in
these works. He used grids to show
the multiple reference points into photography. I think it is really
interesting to see how each images are put together to complete the work. I like
the fact that while a single photograph only show one point of view and only
need a small period of time to look at it, his works need several minutes to
look at and the slight changes of light and composition into the next image are
beautiful. Also, as one can see in “My mother”, I like how the composition of
putting the images together, or the edges of the images, matches with the
subject matter.
One can see the same idea of dividing them into
grids in Hockney’s several paintings, especially in his swimming pool series.
A
Large Diver (Paper Pool 27), 1978
colored and pressed paper pulp, 72x171 in.
colored and pressed paper pulp, 72x171 in.
Schwimmbad
Mitternacht (Paper Pool 11), 1978
colored and pressed paper pulp, 72x85 1/2 in.
colored and pressed paper pulp, 72x85 1/2 in.
I like how he uses colors and the
brushstrokes of the swimming pool. I also like how he painted the reflection
inside the swimming pool.
Richter movie playing again at siskel
Just wanted everyone to know that there are more opportunities at the end of May to see the Richter movie if you haven't already seen it....hooray!
http://www.siskelfilmcenter.org/gerhardrichterpainting
http://www.siskelfilmcenter.org/gerhardrichterpainting
Monday, May 7, 2012
Edgar Degas (Place de la Concorde or Vicomte Lepic & His Daughters) -Dana Kim
“Place de la Concorde” is an oil painting
by Edgar Degas in the year 1875. This painting is also known under the title
“Viconte Lepic and His Daughters.” The painting portrays cigar smoking Ludovic-Napoléon
Lepic with his two daughters crossing the Place de la Concorde. I find this
painting of Degas very interesting and appealing for its innovative
composition, artistic drawing, and sharp analysis of movement. Degas followed
the style of Impressionism. This painting of Degas is representational in form
similar to his other works. It almost depicts what is there in reality. In
“Place de la Concorde,” Degas pays utmost attention to the drawing of figures
and faces in the picture. Apart from effectively using formal elements of art
such as lights and colors, Degas skillfully captures his subjects. In this
painting, Degas depicts movement in different directions. The lines and the
high walls depict the theme of alienation in modern society. The contrast of
light shades the center of the City Square and slightly darker shades toward
the sides provides the painting a realistic touch. The way in which the
subjects in the painting face different directions and the use of large amount
of space shows that a photograph influences it. Thus, “Place de la Concorde”
remains to be one of the best impressionist paintings with a perspective
analysis of movement.
Thomas Eakins (The Swimming hole) -Dana Kim
“The Swimming Hole” is one of Thomas
Eakins’ masterpieces and was painted in the year 1885. Eakins is known as one
of the greatest American realists of the nineteenth century. In “The Swimming
Hole,” Eakins portrays the male nude by painting himself and five other friends
on a creek near Philadelphia. This painting can be considered one of the finest
of Eakins’ outdoor pictures, as depicting the human body is known to be the
most challenging subject in art. The reason I like this painting of Eakins’ is
that it exhibits his mastery over painting the human form. “The Swimming Hole”
accurately captures the movement and details of the subjects. Eakins has also
made effective use of formal elements of art such as line, space, shape, color,
texture, and perspective in this painting. The composition of “The Swimming
Hole” is pyramidal in shape., which is the important aspect of the painting.
The figure of the man reclining at the left leads to the one pointing his arm
upward. This in turn leads to the man at the apex of the pyramid. The man in a
diving position at the right leads to the figure of Eakins himself in a
swimming position. From Eakins’ figure, the attention is driven back to the
painting’s focal point. The uniqueness in the painting lies in the way male
nudity is portrayed in outdoor setting. Eakins’ use of color is remarkable in
this painting. He provides a dark background against the light skin tones of
the swimmers. This helps in drawing attention to the focal point of the
painting. Each figure in the painting is skillfully arranged to imply a
continuous movement such as reclining, sitting, standing, diving, and swimming.
Also, each of the figures is carefully positioned in such a way that their genitals
are not exposed. Thus, the conventional aspects coupled with innovative
elements make “The Swimming Hole” an interesting and lively painting.
From Anna:
I found it interesting that photography has been playing such a major role in painting and continues to do so. I never really gave it much thought, but after taking this class, I realized that most of contemporary painters are borrowing directly from photographic images and very few are actually studying the figure, the landscape, etc. by observation. We live in an age when the romantic beauty of nature or human form is not such a cool thing to worship whether it is in painting, music or other form of art. We are trying to distort it and find new unconventional beauty in everything that surrounds us. Photography and Photoshop make it all so more tempting and inviting to take images apart and reassemble. I am not an advocate for revival of the naturalist beauty aesthetic, but I am just curious when this era of ugly truth in art will be over. What has been traditionally thought of as the ugly things in life that we currently see in art such as violence, pornography, and poverty are deemed beautiful and meaningful now and have been for a while. I do feel that they are in a way more interesting and more beautiful than some of the straightforward, conventional types of beauty that we discard; yet, I think this is a social, economic and political issue. The United States is a wealthy country and most artists here grow up in a somewhat predictably comfortable atmosphere. Few are severely malnourished or physically and emotionally scarred by the societal problems. In other countries, for example in India, that is not the case. For instance, when "Slumdog Millionaire" won the Oscar prize in the States, very few people in India wanted to see this movie, because it portrayed their bitter survival so vividly. Most people in India want to see happiness and beauty in their art, not poverty and despair that surrounds them in daily life. I just wanted to share this thought and observation and wondering what others think about such trends in art.
I found it interesting that photography has been playing such a major role in painting and continues to do so. I never really gave it much thought, but after taking this class, I realized that most of contemporary painters are borrowing directly from photographic images and very few are actually studying the figure, the landscape, etc. by observation. We live in an age when the romantic beauty of nature or human form is not such a cool thing to worship whether it is in painting, music or other form of art. We are trying to distort it and find new unconventional beauty in everything that surrounds us. Photography and Photoshop make it all so more tempting and inviting to take images apart and reassemble. I am not an advocate for revival of the naturalist beauty aesthetic, but I am just curious when this era of ugly truth in art will be over. What has been traditionally thought of as the ugly things in life that we currently see in art such as violence, pornography, and poverty are deemed beautiful and meaningful now and have been for a while. I do feel that they are in a way more interesting and more beautiful than some of the straightforward, conventional types of beauty that we discard; yet, I think this is a social, economic and political issue. The United States is a wealthy country and most artists here grow up in a somewhat predictably comfortable atmosphere. Few are severely malnourished or physically and emotionally scarred by the societal problems. In other countries, for example in India, that is not the case. For instance, when "Slumdog Millionaire" won the Oscar prize in the States, very few people in India wanted to see this movie, because it portrayed their bitter survival so vividly. Most people in India want to see happiness and beauty in their art, not poverty and despair that surrounds them in daily life. I just wanted to share this thought and observation and wondering what others think about such trends in art.
Saturday, May 5, 2012
"Too Hard To Keep"
I recently ran across the blog of Jason Lazarus (SAIC photo faculty) "Too Hard To Keep":
http://toohardtokeep.blogspot.com/
This blog is requesting photos that are deemed "too hard to keep" by those who have come into their possession. Lazarus only asks that after the photos are mailed to them, any existing digital copy be deleted. The blog speaks to the changes that the photographic medium is going through as appropriated images gain a new kind of force and the meanings of individual photographs shift with their shifting owners. As Elizabeth Parker from the Times points out in her article also posted on the blog, "The photos expose the pain and ecstasy of everyday people. It's a public partnership to create art". I'd recommend checking it out. It will be interesting to watch this project unfold.
http://toohardtokeep.blogspot.com/
This blog is requesting photos that are deemed "too hard to keep" by those who have come into their possession. Lazarus only asks that after the photos are mailed to them, any existing digital copy be deleted. The blog speaks to the changes that the photographic medium is going through as appropriated images gain a new kind of force and the meanings of individual photographs shift with their shifting owners. As Elizabeth Parker from the Times points out in her article also posted on the blog, "The photos expose the pain and ecstasy of everyday people. It's a public partnership to create art". I'd recommend checking it out. It will be interesting to watch this project unfold.
Friday, May 4, 2012
Art as Sign Post
I'm not sure if anyone has yet been to see Parcours in the Modern wing but if you are a Modernism nerd you def need to check it out. Works by Liz Deschenes and Florian Pumhösl.
Parcours takes inspiration from an unrealized 1930s exhibition proposal by Austrian-born Bauhaus designer Herbert Bayer. Bayer conceived of a gallery space configured into a maze, with text and the works of art serving as a guiding thread for visitors. Expanding on this premise, Deschenes and Pumhösl selected photographs from the permanent collection of the Art Institute, such as Florence Henri’s Self-Portrait (1928), and László Moholy-Nagy’s Untitled (c.1923/25), and placed them like route markers on temporary walls modified expressly for this show. The artists’ own works–a set of specially tempered glass panels by Pumhösl and lustrous photograms by Deschenes–will reflect these works and the surrounding space.
http://arttattler.com/archiveparcours.html
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Daniel Granitto
Blog Entry One
When looking at the work of Luc Tuymans in class, it reminded me of my
experience with his paintings at the MCA. I had virtually no background knowledge
on his life and how it informed his work. In fact, I hadn’t even seen his paintings
until I stepped into the gallery last year. I remember feeling disinterested, and
somewhat confused as I slowly made my way through the first room. I
thought, “Okay, so I ‘m looking at yet another contemporary painter who just isn’t
very good at painting.” I became more interested as I made my way deeper into the
show, but I do not think I realized that his work was so politically informed until I
got to the image of Condoleezza Rice. But even in front of this painting, I was not too
engaged with the political content and back-story. Instead, I began to appreciate
Tuyman’s style of painting. I was drawn to the speed of the painting, as it appeared
that it might all be applied in one layer somewhat like a puzzle of shapes and tones. I
was later informed that most of his pieces are completed within a day. I was also
suddenly quite drawn to his color palette. The tones of the face were chalky, hazy
and subtle. There was something very quiet; yet powerful in the way he was
presenting color. I left the show with almost a complete change of heart and I now
find his work quite engaging and exciting.
All of this to say, that I was not interested in the political content, though I
know that it is important to his practice. Ultimately, I still ended up appreciating
these works simply for their formal qualities. This is encouraging to me because it
suggests that perhaps people need not know the complete background to an image
in order to enjoy it or at least find it interesting.
Saturday, April 28, 2012
Photography become 3D
Photography
now expressed different way using technology as an art method. Here is interesting program and application I
found, both are make 3D model from 2D photography.
There is
application for mobile that ‘Photosynth’ which combine all hundred picture to
make virtual specific scene as a three dimensional image.
Also the
program ‘123D catch’ is making three-dimensional sculpture combined two-dimensional
images.
Henry Peach Robinson's A Merry Tale (1882)_Emily Song
While having much interest in Henry Peach
Robinson’s staged photography, I though “A merry Tale” (1882) is a good example
to show his process in making photographs. As a well-known pictorialist
photographer, Henry Peach Robinson always encouraged photographers to learn and
show artistic thoughts in their work. Interestingly, Robinson used his sketch
to carefully arrange details for the upcoming shoots. He would select the theme
or the scene in his mind and draw the figures in details with different prompts
and settings. I was surprised how meticulous he was in arranging each figure in
the scene.
When looking at the sketch, it is clear that Robinson had considered costumes,
the light and shade of the figures, and also different accessories that would
enhance the mood of the scene. Although his sketch and the photograph are
somewhat different in terms of location, each model’s gestures and their
positions in the scene are very similar in comparison, except the figure on the
second left. As Robinson always thought carefully about arranging his figures
and gestures in landscape, this is well shown in his Merry Tale. When looking
at each figure, women models all seem to be listening to the woman on the very
right. However, the gestures and feelings expressed by each model are
different. Interestingly, although the photograph is to some extent, an
artificial scene, each model seems to be very real in terms of their gestures
and looks. Robinson’s rule in dresses was that clothes worn by models should
not be new, clean clothes because he stressed the importance of capturing the
characteristics of the country. In this way, his work shows how Robinson
highlighted the importance of relating country activities and harmonies.
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Easy Pictorialism Photo
Instead of posting a blog about a contemporary artist, I thought it would be interesting to talk about Instagram. And I am sure everyone is familiar with Instagram, a photo-sharing program. It is very popular where people share their digitally filtered photos with their friends (I use this too!) Recently, Facebook acquired Instagram for $1 billion! This shows that Instagram is just as popular as Facebook! I thought Instagram would be an interesting topic to discuss in this blog because it is photography-based program. However, this program uses filtering program like Photoshop, but creates ‘vintage’ touch for a nice quality touch. As I was taking this class, it reminded me of Alfred Stieglitz’s photographs.
As we have already discussed in class and museum, Stieglitz’s filtered photographs are cropped images with ambience with painterly aesthetics. His photographs fall into the Pictorialism movement by manipulating the photo. Now, in the 21st century, with the advanced technology and Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger, the founders of Instagram, everyone can create personalized Pictorialism photo.
When I use one photo from my iPhone to create an Instagram phto, there is one process where the users ‘move and scale’ the image, which is relevant to cropping the image. This simple process is reminiscient of cropping the image we have discussed in class.
To me, I have mixed feelings about Instagram. Since anybody with smart phone can create a pictorialism photo, the value of Stieglitz’s work goes down and people would not be able to appreciate Pictorialism photographs. And now, Instagram creates a
Tehching Hsieh
This has nothing to do with painting. :)
I accompanied a friend to the Tehching Hsieh lecture a couple of days ago, being only vaguely familiar with his art beforehand. In case you don't know, Hsieh's body of work is mostly comprised of year-long performance pieces, spanning from the late seventies to the year 1999. These include: locking himself in a jail cell in his studio for one year and depriving himself of human interaction (a friend brought him meals and cleaned up after him, but they weren't allowed to speak), tying himself to another artist with a five-foot rope for one year but not allowing them to make physical contact, living on the streets for a year without being able to go inside any buildings, not being able to talk about, write about, or make any art for a year, and making art for thirteen years, but not talking about it or showing it to anyone.
In order to verify the authenticity of these feats, Hsieh's work relies on a couple of things: a signed legal document stating that a lawyer was present/documentary evidence hasn't been tampered with, etc., and often, photography to document the process. I'm thinking, in particular, of a work he completed in '80-'81 called the "Time Clock Piece" in which he punches a time clock in his studio every hour for a year. He wears a laborer's outfit, and photographs himself immediately after punching the clock. In the lecture we viewed a video that had complied all of the photos. I believe it was about five or six minutes long, but it felt like an inffffinityyyy.
I found a little chunk of the photo-compilation here:
http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/works/one-year-performance/video/1/
I accompanied a friend to the Tehching Hsieh lecture a couple of days ago, being only vaguely familiar with his art beforehand. In case you don't know, Hsieh's body of work is mostly comprised of year-long performance pieces, spanning from the late seventies to the year 1999. These include: locking himself in a jail cell in his studio for one year and depriving himself of human interaction (a friend brought him meals and cleaned up after him, but they weren't allowed to speak), tying himself to another artist with a five-foot rope for one year but not allowing them to make physical contact, living on the streets for a year without being able to go inside any buildings, not being able to talk about, write about, or make any art for a year, and making art for thirteen years, but not talking about it or showing it to anyone.
The Rope Piece |
In order to verify the authenticity of these feats, Hsieh's work relies on a couple of things: a signed legal document stating that a lawyer was present/documentary evidence hasn't been tampered with, etc., and often, photography to document the process. I'm thinking, in particular, of a work he completed in '80-'81 called the "Time Clock Piece" in which he punches a time clock in his studio every hour for a year. He wears a laborer's outfit, and photographs himself immediately after punching the clock. In the lecture we viewed a video that had complied all of the photos. I believe it was about five or six minutes long, but it felt like an inffffinityyyy.
The Time Clock installation |
I found a little chunk of the photo-compilation here:
http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/works/one-year-performance/video/1/
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Charles Sheeler's Flower Forms _Emily Song
Charles Sheeler’s Flower forms (former title) Forms-Flowers
Oil on canvas
Known as one of his series of botanical studies, Flower Forms is an oil
painting done by Charles Sheeler in the year of 1919. Although few colors are
used in this painting, the painting still shows dynamic energy that artist
owns. Thus, the dramatic lighting and absurd curves of the forms clearly show
Sheeler’s interest in abstraction and modernism. Furthermore, this painting is
actually meant to be an extreme close up of a lily, although the painting lacks
details about the subject. These arbitrary colors and shapes show his ways of
looking at nature and how he applied cubistic ideas. As Sheeler avoided to
comment on the direction of source of light on the objects, I love how the
shapes and forms are lighted in various directions, as if they are displayed in
a dark studio with hard lights.
On the other hand, while the
subject was a lily, this painting was actually inspired by one of his nude
photographs he had done in the same year, which was 1919. While we all know
that Sheeler worked with photography as a source for his paintings, the model
was actually his wife. After doing some research about this work, I started to
view this more as a woman’s body. The big curves on each side seemed to
represent woman’s body parts. It
seemed to me that this painting really becomes the artist’s portrayal of beauty.
Overall, the abstracted forms and color really guide viewers to fantasize about
different ideas and definitely serve the artist’s purpose.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Sophie kahn
Sophie kahn
‘Sophie Kahn’ used high-end 3d
scanners, and uses the data to create analog outputs: digital prints
photography. Her background is photography, and developed the application
of new imaging technologies to the body. The idea of her work is making the image as trace; the residue trailed
by a body or place as it moves through time.
The precisely engineered 3d laser scanners she uses were
never designed to represent the body, which is always in flux. When confronted with a moving figure, they
receive conflicting spatial coordinates and generate fragmentary results: a 3d ‘motion
blur’.
Her work is good way to show how scientific image and technology cooperated and represented into created their own art. Her works are shows explore the impossibility of capturing
as a new media of art more than a trace of the past usually photography did. As virtual
image of her work, it represented human’s body into digital space, no matter
time and light. Using human body, not only observing body shape,
but also use organic object as subject and expressed abstract illustration to
trace not only human’s body but also other nature object as her subject.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Artist Recreates 15th Century Portraits in Airplane Lavatory
This artist found an inventive way to make art while in an airplane restroom. Obviously her means were limited by her situation, making the camera the most practical tool for creating these images. The huge disparity between the time periods and the means of production of the centuries old form of painting/portraiture she's emulating only adds to the project's totally delightful weirdness..I'm especially impressed with the creative and totally effective use of the flotation device. From her website:
While in the lavatory on a domestic flight in March 2010, I spontaneously put a tissue paper toilet cover seat cover over my head and took a picture in the mirror. The image evoked 15th-century Flemish portraiture. I decided to add more images made in this mode and planned to take advantage of a long-haul flight from San Francisco to Auckland, guessing that there were likely to be long periods of time when no one was using the lavatory on the 14-hour flight. I made several forays to the bathroom from my aisle seat, and by the time we landed I had a large group of new photographs entitled Lavatory Self-Portraits in the Flemish Style. I was wearing a thin black scarf that I sometimes hung up on the wall behind me to create the deep black ground that is typical of these portraits. There is no special illumination in use other than the lavatory's own lights and all the images are shot hand-held with the camera phone. At the Dunedin Public Art gallery, the photos were framed in faux-historical frames and hung on a deep red wall reminiscent of the painting galleries in museums like the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)